I was wrong. All it took was more reflection and exposure to admit the error of my ways, but I’ll easily do so.
As you might have read a week ago, or even a year ago, I once compared Mobile to a city I visit with regularity: Portland, Ore. I talked about their similarities and differences, what they have and haven’t borrowed from each other but now, after yet another summer respite on the banks of the Columbia, I have to change something.
Though I penned “both have dwelled in the shadows of bigger regional icons – Seattle and New Orleans – that encapsulate their respective region’s distinct cultural flair,” it’s not exactly apt. Flying into and out of New Orleans on the trip confirms it.
Portland and the Crescent City have a lot more in common with each other than with Mobile. And it’s not the crime rate or unemployment.
First of all, there’s food. The rapture with which Portlanders chase and embrace culinary delights is far closer to New Orleanians than Mobilians. Their restaurant scene has been wonderful for years now. They boast both innovation and tradition in menu, design and ambience.
They’re experiencing an explosion with their food carts, something that has taken major American cities by storm in the last five years. You can wander up to these portable eateries around town, some parked in convenient groups around courtyards, and grab a global array of cuisines of top-notch quality at working class prices.
The arts backdrop in Portland is incredibly rich, much like New Orleans, maybe more so. They seem permeated with the belief that artistic expression is as vital to life as oxygen. Shops and galleries are plentiful and the city boasts several districts that have their own festivals and gallery walks interspersed throughout the year. It ranges from grassroots labors to the refined and formal efforts.
Both are towns with an exemplary love for music. It’s more than the fact they both have public radio stations dedicated to jazz and blues – Portland’s KMHD and New Orleans’ WWOZ – or that they have several festivals a year dedicated to those forms. They seem to share bands with frequency, regardless of genre, eager to embrace anything new in that regard.
There even seems to be a stronger link building between the two towns. It’s becoming easier to find those in both cities with connections between the ‘burgs. I know a few people who are moving bock and forth with ease, establishing an infusion of perspective between them.
But most of all, their similarity comes down to attitude. The City of Roses and the Crescent City both crackle with a loosey-goosey, anything-can-happen, live-and-let-live vibe that is the essence of everything they enjoy. It feeds their reputations and potential.
Personally, that seems to be one of the biggest differences between Mobile and those towns. Whether it’s my own erroneous perception or not, there still seems to be a stuffy undercurrent to the Azalea City that has stymied its potential more than any other aspect. I know generations of Mobilians who felt squashed and boxed in here then left to find their own route in places that seemed more open to them. Sadly, most of those people were highly motivated by creative endeavor, with innovative tendencies and unique perspective.
I’m reminded of all that again when I open up the daily newspaper today and see a headline laced with easy snark about a subgroup of young Mobilians and an ongoing battle between a downtown music venue and a neighbor. While Alabama Music Box owner David Mathews may or may not be guilty of vandalizing Irvin Grodsky’s business, there seems to be an unflattering subtext to the noted and lengthy feud.
First of all, I realize from nearly 50 years of life experience, that disagreements between parties usually contain three truths: my truth, your truth, and the whole truth. Personal interpretation can be immense. There could have been fuel added to the Mathews-Grodsky conflagration from both sides or just one, we’ll never know.
But what will always give me pause is why Alabama Music Box has drawn so much neighborly ire from a couple of people. There have been music venues and bars on that block of Dauphin Street since some of Mathews’ patrons were in diapers. Some of those joints didn’t close until well after daybreak. Some boasted a nightly herd of bikers whose revving Harleys were enough to shake the mortar from the historic bricks. Even the spot where the Alabama Music Box sits has been a live music venue since the mid-‘90s.
So what gives? Why now? What element has been absent before?
My hope is that it’s not solely due to the appearance of the patrons, but I have to wonder with the things I’ve experienced and witnessed through the years. I’ve known some wonderful people in Mobile but I’ve also known just as many or more uptight, intolerant residents who would rather everyone step out of the same mold. Lord, just look at the string of vehement comments that followed Press-Register arts editor Thomas Harrison’s tattoo story on al.com this summer. It made Mobile sound about as relaxed as a Sunday with snake-handlin’ tongue-speakers.
The funniest irony of all is that the “hipster” stereotype so easily skewered by the Press-Register is hardly avant-garde. Anyone who has seen the movie career of Michael Cera and the commodification of decades of counter-cultural hallmarks can attest to that. When your 13-year-old niece and all her friends are wearing the same shoes Joey Ramone did, there’s a clue there
There’s nothing wrong with us having our own civic identity but if stuffiness is a key component of that, the amount written on that price tag equals the worth of our future.
